Bibliographic record
Abstract
본 논문에서는 시청자의 색상 특성을 고려하여 양안식 영상에서의 색상 불일치를 예측하는 방법을 제안했다. 먼저 색상 불일치 예측을 위한 주관적 평가로 색상 민감도 평가를 수행했다. 기본 세 채널 색 R, G, B에 대해 각각의 색상의 오차 범위를 결정한 후, 이를 기반으로 관심도와 복잡도를 평가하여 보다 세밀한 주관적 평가를 수행했다. 실험 결과를 통해 제안한 방법이 기존의 색상의 품질을 평가하기 위해 사용하는 유클리디안 색 거리 계산 방법과 US & Canadian Government Printing Offices의 품질 수준 규격(Qulaity Level Specifications)을 이용한 방법보다 효율적으로 색상 불일치 여부를 평가함을 확인했다.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.322 | 0.081 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".