De la fonction aliénante de l’amour au désir anarchiste : posture ironique et mise en scène comique chez Christiane Rochefort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entre dominante réaliste et dominante utopiste, les romans de Christiane Rochefort semblent extrêmement divers. Toutefois, un point de convergence peut être décelé : « Je dois faire un aveu : tous mes livres sont contre l’amour. » Formulation simple, presque lapidaire, qui met en évidence le ton rochefortien, parfois badin, parfois cocasse, le plus souvent direct, dont le dessein premier est de remettre en cause cette évidence, culturelle : l’amour. Forme du pouvoir, l’amour annihile le désir comme voie permettant d’accéder à la conscience. Rochefort attaque les diverses institutions qui tentent de contraindre le désir, non pour subvertir une norme sociale, mais pour créer un espace utopique propice à son expansion. Aussi l’amour apparaît-il comme un lieu de croisement où posture ironique et mise en scène comique correspondraient aux différentes modalités de remise en cause, réalistes et utopiques.AbstractChristiane Rochefort’s novels constantly sway between a realistic and a utopian dominant. That is why they seem to be extremely varied. However, a meeting point can be detected: « To be honest, all my books are against love. » A simple, almost terse phrase that highlights Rochefort’s tone: it is sometimes playful, sometimes funny, mostly straightforward. Its main aim is to question a highly cultural evidence: love. A form of power, love destroys desire as a way to reach consciousness. Rochefort attacks the various institutions that stifle desire, not to subvert social standards but to create a utopian space propicious to its development. Love thus appears as a crossroads where ironical attitude and comical performance could match the questioning modes, both realistic and utopian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".