Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde la question de l’envie au travail, une emotion omnipresente dans les organisations mais absente des theories et des discours de gestion. Prendre en compte l’envie permet de comprendre differemment de nombreux aspects de la vie au travail et d’eclairer sous un nouvel angle certains comportements, problemes et dysfonctionnements courants dans l’entreprise. S’appuyant sur l’analyse de plusieurs cas, ce texte met en evidence l’omnipresence de cette emotion dans les organisations et ses effets potentiellement destructeurs. Il montre ensuite de quelle maniere l’envie peut surgir dans de nombreux actes de management; en effet, le recrutement, la promotion, la gestion des carrieres, la reorganisation, l’evaluation de la performance et la repartition des ressources sont autant de domaines qui, parce qu’ils touchent a la place et a la valeur respectives des individus, sont susceptibles d’exciter l’envie. Enfin, l’auteure indique comment eviter que l’envie ne se developpe durablement dans un contexte de travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it