Oral Pantoprazole for Acid Suppression in the Treatment of Patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of patients with gastric acid hypersecretion due to gastrinoma, usually recognized as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), was radically changed 10 years ago by the use of proton pump inhibitors. Surgical treatment now concentrates on tumour excision, and in the majority of patients, gastrectomy is no longer required to prevent complications of acid hypersecretion that can be managed pharmacologically. AIMS: To verify the ability of pantoprazole to control gastric acid hypersecretion and the clinical effects of acid hypersecretion in seven patients with documented ZES. METHODS: Pantoprazole was administered at an initial dose of 80 mg daily for seven days before basal acid output (BAO) was measured at 08:00, ie, 1 h before the next dose of pantoprazole was normally ingested. A lower (40 mg) or higher (120 mg or more) dose of pantoprazole was then used to keep the BAO in the therapeutic range (between 0.1 and 10 mmol/h) and to control clinical symptoms such as acid-related pain or diarrhea. RESULTS: BAO and clinical symptoms were controlled with pantoprazole 40 mg daily in one patient, 80 mg daily in two patients, 120 mg daily in three patients and 160 mg daily in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole was able to control acid hypersecretion in ZES patients when administered in doses between 40 and 160 mg daily. An initial dose of 120 mg given before further titration of the drug regimen appears to be a reasonable therapeutic strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".