MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1909520518 · doi:10.2110/pec.07.52.0273

Ichnological Variations in Brackish-Water Central-Basin Complexes of Wave-Dominated Estuarine Incised-Valley Fills, Lower Cretaceous Viking Formation, Central Alberta

2007· book-chapter· en· W1909520518 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCretaceousGeologyBrackish waterEstuaryStructural basinGeomorphologyPaleontologyOceanographySalinity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study integrates ichnological, sedimentological and stratigraphic analyses of the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) Viking Formation in west-central Alberta, facilitating the recognition of sand- and mud-prone heterolithic central basin deposits in wave-dominated, estuarine incised valley fills. Core descriptions from 110 wells in four fields (26 wells from Crystal, 4 from Cyn-Pem, 50 from Willesden Green, and 30 from Sundance-Edson) comprise the data set. Central basin settings diverge from open marine settings based on conditions of reduced and fluctuating salinity. Indications of brackish-water conditions can be subtle, often leading to the misidentification of central basin deposits as open marine “Regional Viking” parasequences. Ichnology is ideally suited to assist in the identification of such brackish-water deposits. Ichnological suites, bioturbation intensities, and physical sedimentary structures are used to differentiate five recurring brackish-water, central basin facies associations. Although central-basin deposits are not significant hydrocarbon producers, associated sand-prone facies of incised valley-fills are lucrative. Central basins comprise the most volumetrically extensive deposits of the valley fills and, as a result, exploration and early development wells are most likely to intersect these heterolithic successions. Facies Association CB1 is mud-dominated, and contains trace fossil suites indicative of the most marine conditions of all the central basin deposits. Facies of CB1 are interpreted to record deposition in marine-influenced bays of incompletely barred estuaries. Intervals encompass BI 3-5, with abundant Planolites, Teichichnus, Palaeophycus, Chondrites, “Terebellina” (sensu lato), and Thalassinoides, and subordinate Ophiomorpha, Helminthopsis, Phycosiphon, Asterosoma, Skolithos, Lockeia, Cylindrichnus, Rhizocorallium, Arenicolites and fugichnia. CB1 bay deposits are particularly common to the Sundance-Edson valley system. Facies Association CB2 is also mud-dominated, but generally lacks those ichnogenera considered to be restricted to fully marine settings (e.g., Phycosiphon, Asterosoma, Rhizocorallium, and Helminthopsis). Intervals display variable and generally reduced bioturbation intensities (BI 1-4). Suites comprise Planolites, “Terebellina” (sensu lato), Teichichnus, and secondary Cylindrichnus, Ophiomorpha, Rosselia, Palaeophycus, Diplocraterion, Arenicolites, Skolithos and fugichnia. Very rare occurrences of Chondrites and Lockeia are locally present. Facies of CB2 reflect accumulation in low-energy, strongly brackish bays of well-barred estuaries, and is common to Willesden Green and some Crystal successions. Facies Association CB3 comprises sand-prone heterolithic successions, deposited along shallow bay margins of well-barred estuaries (where it grades upwards from CB2), and/or adjacent to bay-head deltas. The facies displays BI 0-3, with a low-diversity suite of Planolites, Teichichnus, “Terebellina” (sensu lato), Ophiomorpha, diminutive Palaeophycus, and fugichnia. Rarely, Rosselia, Cylindrichnus, Thalassinoides, Diplocraterion, Arenicolites, and Skolithos, and very uncommon occurrences of Chondrites, Rhizocorallium, and Phycosiphon are present. Facies of CB3 are common to the Willesden Green valley and landward portions of the Crystal valley. Facies Association CB4 corresponds to sand-dominated heterolithic intervals. The facies display BI 1-4, with robust ichnogenera and high diversity suites (e.g., Planolites, Teichichnus, fugichnia, Palaeophycus, Ophiomorpha, Thalassinoides, Rosselia, Arenicolites, Cylindrichnus, Diplocraterion, Skolithos, Lockeia, Chondrites, Phycosiphon, Siphonichnus, Taenidium, Asterosoma, and “Terebellina” (sensu lato). Facies Association CB4 is interpreted to represent bay-margin positions of incompletely barred estuaries (e.g., the Sundance-Edson valley, where it grades upwards out of Facies CB1), as well as late-stage bay infill associated with the early stages of transgression (e.g., all Viking incised valleys studied). Facies Association CB5 encompasses sandstones deposited along the seaward edges of central basins, adjacent to the estuary mouth (e.g., associated with flood-tidal deltas and storm-washover fans). This facies displays BI 0-3, with a strongly marine-influenced trace fossil suite. Ichnogenera comprise Planolites, Ophiomorpha, Palaeophycus, Skolithos, and fugichnia, with secondary Teichichnus, Diplocraterion, Arenicolites, Rosselia, “Terebellina” (sensu lato), Thalassinoides, Chondrites, Phycosiphon, Asterosoma, Bergaueria, and Conichnus. Facies of CB5 are common to Willesden Green and Crystal valley successions. Ongoing research seeks to identify characteristic geophysical well-log signatures for central-basin deposits, in order to enhance recognition of estuarine incised-valley fills. Bay-fill signatures in wave-dominated estuaries are commonly misidentified as open-marine parasequences, as bays are generally characterized by sanding-upward successions. Central basins constitute the most areally extensive subenvironments of wave-dominated estuaries, and their deposits are the most likely to be encountered during drilling. Consequently, reliable identification of central basins could facilitate future discoveries of incised valleys. Estuarine incised valley fills are under-represented in the Viking Formation, given the abundance of forced regressive, lowstand, and transgressively incised shoreline trends that have been identified. Integrating ichnology with sedimentology and stratigraphy will assist in the recognition of incised valley fills in the rock record.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it