QALE analysis of CO dissociative kinetics of Ru(CO)<sub>4</sub>L (L = P-donor ligands): accelerating effects of hydrogen in PH<sub>n</sub>R<sub>3 − n</sub>ligands (n = 1–2)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies of CO-dissociative substitution reactions of the complexes Ru(CO)4L (L = a wide variety of P-donor ligands) have been extended and analysis of the results by the QALE methodology has been refined (QALE = quantitative analysis of ligand effects). Rates increase substantially with increasing size of L, mainly as a consequence of increasingly favourable activation entropies. These can be associated with increasing Ru-CO bond breaking that is compensated enthalpically by increasing Ru-P bond making allowed by release of steric strain. Explicit allowance for pi-acidity shows that these effects are just significant while sigma-donor and aryl effects are negligible. However, pendent hydrogen atoms, attached directly to the phosphorus atoms, have a pronounced and unique positive effect on the rates, with significant kinetic isotope effects (KIE). This is associated with the novel occurrence of direct Ru-H or incipient Ru-(eta2-P-H) agostic bond making as the CO ligand departs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".