MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1909898698

How and Why We Speak: Reflecting on Loss and Connection

2007· article· en· W1909898698 on OpenAlexaff
Marion Stichman Gold, Molly Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueReflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHopefulnessNarrativeTransformative learningConnection (principal bundle)Personal narrativePsychoanalysisSociologyMental healthPsychologyGender studiesAestheticsHistorySocial psychologyPsychotherapistPedagogyLiteratureArtEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a personal account of the author's relationship with Angela, a client from whom much was learned about collaborative and respectful practices. Integrating narrative ideas, this is also a story about coming to terms with loss: over five years ago, after struggling with mental health problems and other oppressions for many years, Angela died of an overdose. The author also integrates the voice of her colleague, Laura Anderson, in order to explore the transformative journey that Angela's life and death continues to have the two of them and the struggle to hold on to hopefulness and connection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflections: Narratives of Professional Helping (Click on Current or Archives; Registration Optional)Same topicCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207