Estudio analítico de los efectos de la torsión natural en el comportamiento de edificios de varios pisos torsionalmente desbalanceados ante solicitaciones sísmicas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recommendations ofdesign for torsionally unbalanced multistory buildings, that presents differentcodes Irom desing o/ buildings, in countries like Canada, United Status, Mexico and Australiaamong others and those that you propase different investigators, are analyzed in this documentalong with the recommendations presented within the Design and Constructions EarthquakeResistant Colombian Regulations NSR-98.\nThis study becomes by means 01 a comparative inelastíc analysis o/ the normalized demands ofductility in the resistant planes ofa building, whose centers ofresistance 01jloor do not agree withthe shear centers, with respect to that present these same planes in a model torsionally balanced.The study considers three models of buildings offive-story, subjected to both horizontal componentsofthe El Centro (1940) ground motion; seven procedures 01design that reflect the recommendationsstudied during all the investigation and consider two coefficients ofresistance reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".