The Art of Protein Sorting: Meeting Report from the Annaberg Meeting, Goldegg, Austria, 9–13 January 2001
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first Annaberg Meeting/EMBO Workshop on 'Protein Sorting and Processing in the Secretory Pathway' was held in a small skiing village near Salzburg in 1989.While this conference, attended by about 15 people, was little more than an extended lab meeting of several groups interested in prohormone processing and secretion, the Fifth Annaberg Conference (about 90 attendees) has grown into one of the more significant, enjoyable and intense meetings in protein and vesicle trafficking.As with previous meetings, the attendees were selected not only for their scientific interests but also for their ability to perform on the ski slopes and in the discotheques. Protein-Lipid InteractionsA significant theme that emerged from the previous Annaberg Conferences was that inositol phospholipids play a key role in regulating protein and membrane traffic, and several speakers presented evidence demonstrating the importance of these lipids in vesicle trafficking and organelle structure.Pietro DeCamilli (Yale University) showed that a brain-specific form of the enzyme phosphatidyl 4, phosphate 5-kinase, * Protein Sorting and Processing in the Secretory Pathway; Goldegg, Austria, 9-13 January 2001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.080 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".