Doors Opening Wider: Library and Archival Services to Family History
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans plusieurs collections spciales des centres d'archives et des bibliothques, les chercheurs gnalogistes constituent le plus grand groupe d'usagers.La plupart des tudes concluent qu'en Amrique du Nord et en Europe, ils peuvent compter pour environ 50 90 p.c. de toute la clientle.Ce texte considre les antcdents historiques de la gnalogie dans nos salles de consultation ainsi que le domaine de l'histoire familiale par le biais des sites Web des archives et des bibliothques, en examinant l'histoire familiale telle qu'elle est prsente sur divers sites Web des archives et des bibliothques aux tats-Unis, au Canada, en Angleterre et en cosse.Cette analyse des sites Web vise trois cibles principales : tablir l'tat actuel de nos vitrines publiques telles qu'elles sont prsentes aux chercheurs gnalogistes, identifier les domaines de pratiques exemplaires ainsi que ceux qui requirent de l'amlioration et crer une vision de ce que les archives pourraient offrir aux gnalogistes sur leurs sites Web.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it