MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910205654 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n22p116

Implementation of Islamic Civilization and Asian Civilization Course: Experience in National University of Malaysia and Private Higher Education Institutions towards Consolidating the Element of Science and Technology

2015· article· en· W1910205654 on OpenAlex
Nazri Muslim, Abdul Latif Samian, Nur Hafilah Musa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationIslamSubject (documents)CurriculumChristian ministryHigher educationSociologyElement (criminal law)Mathematics educationPolitical sciencePedagogyPsychologyLawComputer scienceTheologyLibrary sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islamic Civilization and Asian Civilization (TITAS) course at Public Higher Educational Institution (IPTA) has long been implemented in National University of Malaysia (UKM). In UKM, it is compulsory for all students to sit for TITAS paper, and this requirement is applied to both Muslim and non-Muslim students. This is different for students enrolled in Private Higher Educational Institutions (IPTS) where its operation is subject to the Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996, or known as Act 555 which serves to regulate the establishment, registration, management and supervision as well as the monitoring of quality of education provided by IPTS. Based on the provisions provided in Section 43, all IPTS should teach Malaysian Studies and Islamic Studies subjects for Muslim students and Moral Education subject for non-Muslim students. These subjects are known as Compulsory Subject (MPW) and must be taken by all students and are considered as must-pass subjects for graduating. Thus, after 15 years of MPW implementation, the Ministry of Education has revamped the structure MPW into General Subject (MPU). Among the goals of this new structure is to improve students’ potential ability towards producing holistic students and homogenizing general education curriculum between IPTA and IPTS. This objective is achieved through the appreciation of philosophy, values and history, soft skills mastery, broadening of knowledge according the Malaysian way and the application of soft skills. Therefore, this article will discuss the Islamic Civilization and Asian Civilization course in the new MPU structure in IPTS in comparison with the IPTA. From the discussion, it was found that Islamic Civilization and Asian Civilization course has been applied in the MPU structure towards producing students who appreciate good values and identity. At the same time, suggestions were also presented, so that the elements of science and technology will also be adopted in Islamic Civilization and Asian Civilization course especially in matters regarding the roles and contributions of Science and Technology to world civilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it