Qualitative Analysis of Mango (<i>Mangifera indica</i> L.) Fruits at Different Maturity Stages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some chemical compositions of mango harvested at 24, 18, 12, 6 days before optimum maturity and at optimum maturity were analyzed. The amount of ascorbic acid, ?-carotene and sugars of the harvested mangoes were significantly influenced by the stages of harvest and period of storage. Amount of ascorbic acid of the harvested mango fruits was the highest just after harvest. It was sharply declined with the elapse of time in storage. Fruits harvested before optimum maturity showed the highest amount of ascorbic acid, which decreased in delay of harvest. ?-carotene was quite low at harvest but rapidly increased in storage. Fruits harvested before optimum maturity showed minimum ?-carotene and it rapidly increased in late harvested fruits. Total sugar, reducing sugar and non reducing sugar were sharply increased at optimum ripe stage, while slightly declined at last edible stage. All the sugars were the lowest at earliest harvests, which increased gradually with delay in harvest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".