MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W191053623

Plasmas Lasers et Champs Magnétiques

2014· dissertation· fr· W191053623 on OpenAlexaff
B. Albertazzi

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons étudié le couplage entre un plasma crée par laser et un champ magnétique dans deux
\nconfigurations : 1) celle où les champs magnétiques sont autogénérés au cours de l’interaction laser-plasma,
\nproblématique liée à celle de la Fusion par Confinement Inertiel (FCI) et 2) celle où un champ
\nmagnétique externe est appliqué à un plasma laser en expansion libre dans le vide, configuration
\npermettant notamment la modélisation en laboratoire des jets de matière observés en astrophysique.
\nLa première partie de cette thèse est donc dédiée à une étude numérique et expérimentale de la
\ndynamique des champs magnétiques autogénérés lors de l’irradiation d’une cible solide par un laser de
\npuissance (de durée d’impulsion nanoseconde ou picoseconde). Ces champs sont à considérer dans le
\ncadre de la FCI car, en influençant la dynamique des électrons générés dans l’interaction, ils
\nconditionnent en partie la réussite des expériences de fusion. La seconde partie de cette thèse est
\ndédiée à l’étude expérimentale et numérique de la capacité qu’a un champ magnétique externe à
\nmodifier la morphologie d’un jet de plasma produit par laser, notamment à le collimater. Ce travail
\nvise à mieux comprendre le phénomène de collimation à grande échelle observée dans les jets
\nastrophysiques. Nous montrons notamment qu’un champ magnétique purement axial peut contraindre
\nun écoulement, au départ isotrope, en un choc de recollimation générant un étroit jet bien collimaté, un
\nphénomène non expliqué dans le cadre des théories jusqu’alors prévalentes. La convergence observée,
\net le chauffage subséquent, du plasma au point recollimation sont de plus avancés comme permettant
\nd’expliquer d’intrigantes observations d’émission X stationnaire au sein des jets astrophysiques.<br /><br />We studied the coupling between a laser produced plasmas and a magnetic field in two cases: 1) in the
\ncontext of Inertiel Fusion Confinement (ICF), we first studied how magnetic fields are self generated
\nduring the interaction between a target and a laser, then 2) to progress in the understanding of the
\nlarge-scale shaping of astrophysical jets, we studied the influence of an externally applied magnetic
\nfield on the dynamics of a laser-produced plasma expanding into vacuum.
\nThe first part of this thesis is thus dedicated to a numerical and experimental study of the self
\ngenerated magnetic fields that are produced following the irradiation of a solid target by a high power
\nlaser (having pulse duration in the nanosecond and picosecond regimes). These fields play an
\nimportant role in the frame of ICF since they influence the dynamics of the electrons produced during
\nthe laser-matter interaction, and thus condition the success of ICF experiments. The second part of this
\nthesis is a numerical and experimental study of the influence of an externally applied magnetic field on
\nthe morphology of a laser produced plasma freely otherwise expanding into vacuum. This work aims
\nat better understanding the observed large-scale collimation of astrophysical jets which cannot be
\nunderstood in the frame of existing models. We notably show that show that a purely axial magnetic
\nfield can force an initially isotropic laboratory flow, scaled to be representative of a flow emerging
\nfrom a Young Star Object, in a recollimation shock, from which emerges a narrow, well collimated jet.
\nWe also show that the plasma heating induced at the recollimation point could explain the “puzzling”
\nobservations of stationary X ray emission zones embedded within astrophysical jets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique)Same topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207