MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Germanium and Germanium Compounds

2004· other· en· W1910573134 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis W. Thomas, Tariq Mahmood, Charles B. Lindahl

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2004
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsEaglePicher (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermaniumMaterials scienceSmeltingMetallurgySilicon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Germanium is a semiconducting metalloid element found in Group 14 (IVA), Period 4 of the Periodic Table. Although it looks like a metal, it has a diamond cubic crystal structure and is fragile like glass. Its electrical resistivity is about midway between that of metallic conductors and good electrical insulators. The first significant use was in solid‐state electronics, and, using germanium, the transistor was invented. The entire modern field of semiconductors owes it development to the early successful use of germanium. Germanium is used for optical fiber production, as polymerization catalysts, in infrared optics, in electronic and solar applications, and in other miscellaneous markets. Germanium usually occurs widely dispersed in minerals. Most germanium production has been from zinc smelters and copper smelters. Germanium also occurs in significant concentrations in many coals around the world. Germanium is quite stable in air up to 400°C, where slow oxidation begins. The metal resists concentrated acid and alkali. Many Ge alloys have been prepared and studied. No mineral is mined solely for its germanium content. Almost all of the Ge recovered worldwide is a by‐product of other mining. Germanium compounds generally have a low order of toxicity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologySame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207