MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910715712 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1993.332439

Approximation of spectrogrammes by cubic splines using the Kalman filter

2002· article· en· W1910715712 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Data Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterSpline (mechanical)Convolution (computer science)Applied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematicsSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The raw spectrogrammes are subject to systematic errors of an instrumental type that may be reduced provided a mathematical model of the instrumental imperfections is identified. It is assumed in the paper that this model has the form of an integral, convolution-type equation of the first kind. The correction of the spectrogrammes consists in numerically solving this equation on the basis of the noisy data acquired by a spectrometer. An algorithm of correction is proposed which is based on the approximation of the solution with a spline function whose parameters are determined by means of a recursive Kalman-filter-based algorithm with a non-negativity constraint imposed on the set of feasible solutions. It is shown, using synthetic and real spectrophotometric data, that an improvement in the quality of correction is attained.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207