MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910732401 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.3209

CUA Guideline: The workup and management of azoospermic males

2015· article· en· W1910732401 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Keith Jarvi, Kirk Lo, Ethan D. Grober, Victor Mak, Anthony Fischer, John Grantmyre, Armand Zini, Peter Chan, Geneviève Patry, Victor Chow, Trustin Domes

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthorityUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of TorontoDalhousie UniversityCégep de LévisMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuidelineMedicineGynecologyGeneral surgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A committee was established at the request of the Canadian Urological Association to develop guidelines for the investigation and management of azoospermia.Members of the committee, all of whom have special expertise in the investigation and management of male

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0070.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207