MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association of insect life stages using DNA sequences: the larvae of <i>Philodytes umbrinus</i> (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)

2005· article· en· W1910991824 on OpenAlexafffund
Kelly B. Miller, Yves Alarie, G. William Wolfe, MF Whiting

Bibliographic record

VenueSystematic Entomology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDytiscidaeBiologyPhylogenetic treeLarvaZoologyTaxonomy (biology)Mitochondrial DNAPhylogeneticsDNA barcodingEcologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Insect life stages are known imperfectly in many cases, and classifications are based often on only one or a few semaphoronts of a species. This is unfortunate as information in alternative life stages often is useful for scientific study. Although recent examples of DNA in taxonomy have emphasized the identification of indistinguishable species, such sequence data facilitate the association of life history stages and hold considerable promise in phylogenetic analysis, evolutionary studies, diagnostics, etc. These concepts are discussed here and an example is provided from diving beetles (Dytiscidae: Coleoptera). Three unknown larval specimens of an apparent species of Laccophilinae collected in Namibia were associated with the species Philodytes umbrinus (Motschulsky) using DNA sequence data. An 806‐bp portion of the gene cytochrome oxidase I was sequenced from the unknown larvae. Several identified adult specimens of species of Laccophilinae from Namibia were also sequenced, including two P. umbrinus specimens and specimens from four Laccophilus Leach species. Additional species of Laccophilus from other areas of the world also were sequenced, as were specimens of Agabetes acuductus (Harris), Australphilus saltus Watts, Neptosternus boukali Hendrich & Balke and a species of Laccodytes Régimbart. Parsimony analysis resulted in two most parsimonious trees with the unknown larva unambiguously resolved in a group with both adult specimens of P. umbrinus (bootstrap value = 100%). The average pairwise p ‐distance between the unknown larva and adult P. umbrinus specimens averaged 0.09% (0–0.14%), compared with an average divergence between other conspecifics in the analysis of 0.24% (0–0.82%) and an overall average divergence between species of 13.49% (1.90–19.86%). Based on this, the unknown larvae were assigned to P. umbrinus . The larvae are diagnosed and described and their relationship with other Laccophilinae is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystematic EntomologySame topicLepidoptera: Biology and TaxonomyFrench-language works237,207