Bibliographic record
Abstract
A s s --a an nd d M Me ed da ak k P Po oc ck ke et t p pu ub bl li is sh he ed d i in n a a b bo oo ok k C Ch ha an nc ce es s f fo or r P Pe ea ac ce eThe Second Battalion of the Princess Patricia Light Infantry/Battle group was being commended..( )..for a heroic and professional mission during the Medak Pocket Operation in the former Yugoslavia in September 1993.In extreme peril and facing enemy artillery, small arms and heavy machinegun fire, as well as antitank and antipersonnel mines, members of the 2.PPCLI Battle group held their ground and drove the Croatian forces back.The exemplary actions of the battle group caused the Croatian Army to cease their ongoing tactics of ethnic cleansing in the Sector (South authors remark), without question saving many innocent civilian lives.That is the quote from the citation the 2.PPCLIs Lt. Colonel Jim Calvin and a few hundred present soldiers, protagonists of the Medak Pocket events, were awarded by the Governor General of Canada and the Canadian military forces Commander in Chief, Ms. Adrienne Clarkson, on December 1st 2002 in Winnipeg, Canada.That citation proves how to impose a historical truth.Croats attacked Canadian peacekeepers; a battle between them was waged, the Croats were defeated and forced to withdraw, and after their committed war crimes they became a nation with a tarnished reputation in the eyes of Canadians and the rest of the world.Was that really the historical truth?Or was that an adapted, new truth, in which the Canadian Army was embellishing something that did not take place and the Croatian Army, state and its people were condemned for actions they did not do perpetrate.Is that somewhat late citation awarded as a cover for the ugly incidents Canadian forces had been involved with in Somalia?Does that citation help the Canadian Army reclaim the position and privileges it had in Canadian society?Is the citation intended to boost the Armys morale and effectiveness in a time that brings many uncertainties with it even a proposal for the Canadian Armys radical reform and a new approach to Canada involvement in the worlds peacekeeping, which has been Canadas pride?I do not think that the Canadian Army, Canadians, or Canada are to be blamed for criminal acts in Somalia.In Somalia, the brunt of guilt should be put on specific Canadians involved, and they should be punished.The same should apply to guilty Croatian individuals in the Medak Pocket Operation.Much like Canadian soldiers in Somalia, the evidence needs to be examined, guilt proven and punishments should be passed without changing the events of history.After a thorough investigation of the facts about the events of the Medak Pocket some half-truths could be revealed.Point one -the citation the Governor General and Chief of Defence awarded to Canadian forces for the mission accomplished in the former Yugoslavia.At the end of 2002 the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".