Vitamin D levels in women with systemic lupus erythematosus and fibromyalgia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Many patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and fibromyalgia (FM) may spend less time exposed to the sun than healthy individuals and thus might have low vitamin D levels. It is known that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) inhibits conversion of 25(OH)- to 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D both in vitro and in patients with sarcoidosis. We assessed winter serum 25(OH)- and 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D levels in patients with SLE and FM. METHODS: We recruited 25 consecutive female SLE and 25 female FM patients in London, Ontario, between January and March 2000. Subjects completed a brief questionnaire. Serum levels of 25(OH)-, 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured. RESULTS: In SLE patients mean 25(OH)-vitamin D was 46.5 nmol/l and mean 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D was 74.4 pmol/l. In FM patients these means were 51.5 nmol/l and 90.1 pmol/l, respectively. Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D levels did not significantly differ between SLE and FM patients, nor after adjusting for age and vitamin D, milk consumption, and sun block use. In 14 of the SLE patients and 12 of the FM patients 25(OH)-vitamin D levels < 50 nmol/l were found. SLE patients not using vitamin D supplements had lower 25(OH)-vitamin D levels than those who did. 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D tended to be lower in the SLE compared to the FM patients. This difference could be attributed to HCQ use: HCQ users (n = 17) had lower 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D levels than nonusers (n = 33); the mean adjusted difference was 24.4 pmol/l (95% CI 2.8-49.9). CONCLUSION: Half the SLE and FM patients had 25(OH)-vitamin D levels < 50 nmol/l, a level at which PTH stimulation occurs. Our data suggest that in SLE patients HCQ might inhibit conversion of 25(OH)-vitamin D to 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".