MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1911924512 · doi:10.1109/icatm.1999.786846

Proactive management of MPEG traffic in ATM networks using time sequenced RLS filters

2003· article· en· W1911924512 on OpenAlexaff
T.S. Randhawa, R.H.S. Hardy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVariable bitrateCyclostationary processMultiplexingStatistical time division multiplexingAlgorithmReal-time computingRecursive least squares filterAdaptive filterComputer networkBit rateTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The capability of predicting VBR traffic can significantly improve the effectiveness of numerous management tasks such as dynamic bandwidth allocation and congestion control. This work demonstrates the applicability of time-sequenced adaptive filters in linear prediction of statistically multiplexed MPEG (Motion Pictures Experts Group) VBR (variable bit rate) video traffic. Time-sequenced adaptive filters allow for the cyclostationary nature of the input by periodically changing the filter and adaptation parameters. This predictor set up is ideal for predicting multiplexed MPEG traffic which has periodically recurring statistical properties and can be considered as a concatenation of PAR (periodic autoregressive) cyclostationary processes. The viability of the approach is illustrated through computer simulations. A number of half-hour long empirical MPEG-1 traces are multiplexed and, subsequently, the aggregated traffic is predicted. The RLS (recursive least squares) algorithm is used for adaptation. The results indicate that the RLS algorithm clearly outperforms the conventional LMS (least mean square) adaptive algorithm in terms of convergence speed and steady-state mean-square prediction error, and, hence, is a more suitable candidate for such an application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207