La Bible des poëtes 1 : une réécriture rhétorique des Métamorphoses d’Ovide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Avec la rédaction de l’Ovide moralisé en vers, la première moitié du xive siècle marque l’avènement des traductions intégrales des Métamorphoses d’Ovide. Le succès du long poème est tel que, jusqu’à la Renaissance, les versions en prose et les remaniements en vers se succéderont régulièrement. Parue en 1484 à Bruges sous la presse de l’imprimeur Colard Mansion, la Bible des poëtes est la première version imprimée des témoins de cette tradition. L’ouvrage hérite de ses prédécesseurs un goût prononcé pour les moralisations qui, au gré des commentaires, traductions et traités mythographiques, n’ont cessé de travailler la matière fabuleuse ovidienne pour l’adapter aux exigences du monde chrétien. L’examen du sort particulier réservé au traitement du mythe de Phaéthon offre l’occasion d’appréhender les dispositifs rhétoriques et les méthodes exégétiques mis en oeuvre dans les quinze livres du texte ovidien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".