La conversion de HLM pour personnes âgées en HLM mixtes : le point de vue des résidants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente les résultats d'une enquête effectuée en 1996 auprès des personnes âgées d'ensembles HLM dans le but de saisir les impacts de la transformation d'ensembles HLM pour personnes âgées en ensembles d'habitation mixtes, ouverts aux familles ou aux personnes à faibles revenus de moins de 55 ans. Trois quartiers de Montréal ont été sélectionnés, et deux ensembles HLM dans chaque quartier, l'un homogène du point de vue de l'âge (réservé aux personnes âgées), l'autre mixte. L'analyse comparée des milieux de vie réservés aux personnes âgées et de ceux qui sont caractérisés par la mixité desclientèles révèle des différences significatives et nous a permis de constater que cette mixité recouvre non seulement des différences d'âge mais des contrastes plus profonds en termes de modes de vie, de trajectoires et de positions sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".