MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1912426016 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2003.1213470

A parallel ant colony optimization algorithm for all-pair routing in MANETs

2004· article· en· W1912426016 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Touhidul Islam, Parimala Thulasiraman, Ruppa K. Thulasiram

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMobile ad hoc networkAnt colony optimization algorithmsDistributed computingWireless ad hoc networkRouting (electronic design automation)Parallel computingHeuristicLoad balancing (electrical power)Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingSpeedupWorkstationComputer networkRouting protocolLink-state routing protocolWirelessAlgorithmNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) consists of mobile wireless nodes that communicate in a distributed fashion without any centralized administration. The nodes instantaneously and dynamically form a network on the fly when it is needed. We define an irregular application as one that changes the network dynamically during runtime, exhibits chaotic load balancing among the processors and unpredictable communication behavior among the nodes during runtime. An ad hoc network has all these characteristics and hence could be considered as an irregular application from the parallel computing perspective. In this paper, we design an on-demand routing algorithm called source update for MANET using a meta-heuristic based on the ant colony optimization (ACO) search technique. We develop a mechanism to detect cycles, parallelize this algorithm on a distributed memory machine using MPI, and study the performance of the parallel algorithm. On a distributed network of workstations, we obtain a relative speedup of 7 with 10 processors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207