MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1912470045 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2004.1329030

A low-power, 10 GHz back-gated tuned voltage controlled oscillator with automatic amplitude and temperature compensation

2004· article· en· W1912470045 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Murji, M. Jamal Deen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorNMOS logicPhase noiseElectrical engineeringVackář oscillatorCMOSdBcInductorVariable-frequency oscillatorAmplitudeVoltageMaterials scienceTransistorDigitally controlled oscillatorPhysicsEngineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design results of a 10 GHz CMOS voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) with automatic amplitude control (AAC). The circuit is an LC oscillator using an integrated octagonal inductor. The VCO is fully integrated and simulation results are shown for a deep n-well 0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS process which allows access to the body of NMOS transistors. The frequency is tuned using the back-gated voltages of the NMOS cross-coupled differential pair in the oscillator. Over temperature variations, the frequency of operation is 10.02 GHz, with a tuning range of 500 MHz, phase noise of -102 dBc/Hz@1MHz and power dissipation of 3.7 mW from a 1.8 V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207