MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1912511169

The United States 'Marine Mammal Protection Act' (MMPA): policy implications, challenges, opportunities and a strategy for the east coast sealing industry

2008· dissertation· en· W1912511169 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSAS software applications and methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessSeal (emblem)International tradeAgricultural economicsNatural resource economicsCommerceGeographyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1972 restrictions arising from the United States Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) have seriously hampered efforts to develop commercial markets for seal products to the United States, and other international markets influenced by the MMPA. This has resulted in significant negative economic impacts on the east coast Canadian seal fishery. The exemption of harp seal products from the restrictive grip of the MMPA is critical if the United States market for seal products is to be effectively developed. It is anticipated that access to the United States market would present new market opportunities for the sealing industry, particularly in the fur and neutraceutical sectors. The U.S. 'health food' sector alone is estimated to be worth $80 billion per year (Ho, 2003). This market includes all omega-three, oil based concentrates and a full range of herbal and homeopathic remedies purchased through the health food system. -- There is limited historical United States market data for seal products, as seal products impacted by 'MMPA' have not been exported to that market since the early 1970's. Therefore, to evaluate market potential, this report establishes linkages using similar products in the categories of other furs and marine oils. The potential American market for fashion fur items is significant, with United States fur sales of $1.53 billion reported in 2002. (http://www.nafa.ca/page.asp.) These strong market indicators might present an opportunity for the Canadian sealing industry, should the American market become accessible. -- The economic benefits of the current seal fishery and the total value of the seal industry to Newfoundland and Labrador is an important factor in determining our export readiness for developing the United States markets. In 2007, the sealing industry in Newfoundland and Labrador employed 6,000 harvesters and over 300 production employees and there are spin off benefits in service industries, supplies, transportation, vessel and plant maintenance. (T. Grace, personal communication, June, 2008). -- This paper analyzes important issues surrounding the MMPA, including the more recent activities related to the Act. The recommendations in this paper focus on a strategy for Governments, the private sector and trade associations, to address issues related to MMPA. These recommendations will be of particular interest to the Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture and the Canadian Sealers Association, who have coordinated their efforts since 2004 in support of amendments to the MMPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it