Inverse Relationship between Release Probability and Readily Releasable Vesicles in Depressing and Facilitating Synapses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that the probability of vesicular exocytosis at synapses is positively correlated with the pools of readily releasable synaptic vesicles, as shown for mammalian neurons grown in tissue culture. We compared synapses of two identified glutamatergic neurons: phasic (high-output, depressing) and tonic (low-output, facilitating) crustacean motor neurons, which differ 100- to 1000-fold in quantal content. Estimates of vesicles available for exocytosis were made from depletion during forced release and from electron microscopic observation of vesicles docked at synaptic membranes near active zones. Both measurements showed a significantly larger pool of readily releasable vesicles in facilitating synapses, despite their much lower quantal output during stimulation. Thus, the probability for release of docked vesicles is very much lower at facilitating synapses, and the presence of more docked vesicles does not predict higher synaptic release probability in these paired excitatory neurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".