The Effect of the Confidence Notion in the Chinese Culture Through the Dictums
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chinese dictum conveys his culture. The present paper aims to make a survey on the confidence notion in the Chinese culture. This notion is bound to the anthers virtues such as human sense, ritual spirit, just sense, wisdom. Theses notions constitute five guiding principles. The confidence notion is worth considering, because it can ensure the human contact. We attach attention to this notion in order to construct a harmonious society. Key words: dictum; confidence notion; interpersonal relation; the Chinese cultureResume: Les dictons chinois charrient sa culture. Notre texte vise a souligner le role de la notion de confiance dans la culture chinoise. Cette notion se rattache aux autres vertus comme le sens humain, l’esprit rituel, le sens du juste, la sagesse, ce qui constitue cinq constantes. Si la confiance est digne de consideration, c’est qu’elle assure le contact du soi a l’autre. La prise en compte de cette notion est de mise dans le cadre de la construction d’une societe harmonieuse.Mots–cles: dicton; la notion de confiance; les relations interpersonnelles, la culture chinoise
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".