MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1912849855 · doi:10.1177/1077546302008001519

Nonlinear Modeling, Experimental Verification, and Theoretical Analysis of a Hydraulic Engine Mount

2002· article· en· W1912849855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)MountPerturbation (astronomy)Describing functionAmplitudeLinear modelResonance (particle physics)Nonlinear resonanceMechanicsEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the nonlinear modeling of the decoupler in a hydraulic engine mount. The authors have introduced a simple nonlinear mathematical model in this case, which is in agreement with experimental results available in the literature. The novelty of the model is its simplicity, which makes it suitable for theoretical analysis. Using the multiple scale perturbation method, the authors have examined the behavior of the mount at resonance. The significant difference between the behaviors of the nonlinear model, as predicted here by the perturbation method, and the linear model at resonance is the existence of a jump phenomenon. The nonlinear resonance results in high-amplitude steady state or unstable behavior at high frequencies and is not predicted by the linear model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it