Tri-<i>tert</i>-butylphosphine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[12716-12-6] C12H27P (MW 202.32) 1S/C12H27P/c1-10(2,3)13(11(4,5)6)12(7,8)9/h1-9H3 InChIKey = BWHDROKFUHTORW-UHFFFAOYSA-N (supporting ligand for palladium-1 and rhodium-catalyzed2 cross-coupling reactions) Physical Data: mp 30 °C; bp 102–103 °C/13 Torr; d 0.812 g cm−3. Solubility: sol in most organic solvents; insol in H2O. Form Supplied: colorless liquid or low-melting solid; approx. 10%(w/w) solution in hexane; or as HBF4 salt as a white solid; widely available in all forms. Purification: by vacuum distillation (102–103 °C, 13 Torr). Handling, Storage, and Precautions: the pure material is pyrophoric and must be handled under an oxygen-free atmosphere to avoid spontaneous combustion. In the absence of oxygen, it is indefinitely stable. Solutions (ca. 10%) of tri-tert-butylphosphine are not pyrophoric, but should be handled under an inert atmosphere in order to avoid oxidation to the phosphine oxide. The HBF4 salt is air-stable. Tri-tert-butylphosphine is corrosive and causes burns on contact with skin. It is incompatible with oxidizing agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".