Compressed sensing CPMG with group‐sparse reconstruction for myelin water imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Myelin content is a marker for nervous system pathology and is quantifiable by myelin water imaging using multi-echo CPMG sequence, which is inherently slow. One way to accelerate the scan is to utilize compressed sensing. However, reconstructing the images piecemeal by standard compressed sensing methods is not the optimal solution, because it only exploits intraimage spatial redundancy. It does not recognize that the different T2 weighted images are scans of the same anatomical volume and hence correlated. The purpose of this work is to test the feasibility of compressed sensed CPMG with group-sparsity promoting optimization for myelin water imaging. METHODS: Group-sparse reconstruction was performed at various simulated and actual undersampling factors for an electronic phantom, ex vivo rat spinal cord, and in vivo rat spinal cord. Normalized mean square error was used as the metric for comparison. RESULTS: For both simulated undersampling and the actual undersampling, the method was found to minimally impact myelin water fraction map quality (normalized mean square error < 0.25) when acceleration factor was below two. CONCLUSION: Compressed sensed CPMG with group-sparse reconstruction is useful for achieving a shorter scan time than traditionally possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".