MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1913687561 · doi:10.1109/pac.1997.749941

Status of the RFD linac prototype

2002· article· en· W1913687561 on OpenAlexaff
D.A. Swenson, F.W. Guy, J.W. Lenz, K.R. Crandall, J. M. Potter

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsCrandall University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear particle acceleratorTriodeProtonPhysicsNuclear engineeringDrift tubeNuclear physicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringBeam (structure)OpticsEngineeringIonVoltageResistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 2.5-MeV prototype of a "Compact 12-MeV Proton Linac for PET Isotope Production" is under construction at Linac Systems. This unit will serve as the "proof of principle" for the revolutionary new RF Focused Drift tube (RFD) linac structure. Both the prototype and the production unit will operate at 600 MHz. The prototype comprises a 25-keV proton ion source, an einzel-lens-based LEBT, a 0.65-m-long RFQ linac to 0.8 MeV, and a 0.35-m-long RFD linac to 2.5 MeV. The two linac structures will be resonantly coupled together and powered by a collection of planar triodes. The entire assembly will be evacuated by 2 turbomolecular pumps and 1 ion pump. The alignment philosophy is based on precision machining and "hard socket" for installation of the drift tubes. Fabrication methods for achieving the required precision will be described. Installation of a Laboratory Building to house the prototype is nearing completion. The prototype is scheduled for completion in the fall of 1997. The status of this project after 7 months of funded activity is reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207