Doença de Crohn e retocolite ulcerativa inespecífica: alexitimia e adaptação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La enfermedad de Crohn y la Retocolitis Ulcerativa Inespecífica (RCUI) son enfermedades gastrointestinales inflamatorias. Como la misma puede afectar severamente la vida de sus portadores, el estudio objetivó investigar la eficacia adaptativa y el nivel de alexitimia, de estos pacientes. Se investigo también la medida en que cada una de estas medidas se correlacionaba con la severidad de los síntomas gastrointestinales y con el tiempo de la enfermedad. La muestra fue formada por 25 pacientes, ambulatoriales, con Enfermedad de Crohn (52%) y RCUI (48%). Instrumentos: Escala Diagnóstica Adaptativa Operacionalizada - Redefinida (EDAO-R) y Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS). Resultados: 1. alto comprometimiento en la calidad de adaptación y no nivel de alexitimia, sin que necesariamente exista associación entre ellas; 2. la cualidad de la adaptación no presenta asociación con la severidad de la sintomatología, ni con el tiempo de la enfermedad; 3. la alexitimia se mostró negativamente asociada a La gravedad de los síntomas gastrointestinales pero no con el tiempo de la enfermedad. Investigaciones con muestras más representativas son sugeridas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".