MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1913837066 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2015-0259

A new cobalt(II)-containing coordination polymer composed of dinuclear metal units: synthesis, crystal structure, and magnetic properties with DFT calculations

2015· article· en· W1913837066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiangyu Liu, Huaixian Liu, Huiliang Zhou, Peipei Cen, Xiaoyong Jin, Weiming Song, Shuchang Luo, Qilin Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryIsophthalic acidCrystallographyCobaltAntiferromagnetismCarboxylateMagnetic susceptibilityCoordination polymerOctahedronLigand (biochemistry)Crystal structureMetalStereochemistryInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new Co(II)-based compound with a 3-phenyl-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,2,4-triazole (4-Hppt) and isophthalic acid (H2ip) mixed ligand, [Co(4-Hppt)2(ip)] (1), has been synthesized and structurally and magnetically characterized. The structure of compound 1 consists of one-dimensional coordination chains based on the Co2 units bridged by dual carboxylate groups, where the pyridyl nitrogen atoms in 4-Hppt ligands are located in the axial coordination sites of the octahedral Co(II) nodes. Magnetic investigation suggests that the magnetic coupling derived from the dinuclear Co(II) ions is a moderately antiferromagnetic exchange in the title compound. Moreover, DFT calculations have been performed on the compound to offer a qualitatively theoretical explanation of the magnetic behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207