Principales orientaciones actuales del planeamiento de las capitales europeas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indice Introduccion en el planeamiento urbano y territorial de un enfoque estrategico, marcado por objetivos de de las regiones urbanas y orientado con criterios de competencia. La region urbana es el ambito relevante de referencia en el que los planes municipales de las capitales -cuando son objeto de una redaccion diferenciada aparecen expresamente encuadrados. Fomento de una estructuracion policentrica de las regiones urbanas y de la formacion de redes regionales de ciudades. Orientacion predominante del desarrollo urbano hacia una mayor densificacion de las areas consolidadas: alternativa a la edificacion de nuevos espacios. Colaboracion entre los distintos niveles de la administracion publica y estimulo a la asociacion de entes publicos y privados. Preocupacion por el entorno como via para garantizar una mayor calidad de vida a las poblaciones residentes. Transporte publico. Modernizacion del marco de desarrollo de la planificacion en la linea de una mayor transparencia hacia el publico y mayor flexibilidad. Resumen Las orientaciones actuales del planeamiento en las capitales europeas tienen un cierto numero de factores comunes que caracterizan las principales tendencias y objetivos: la introduccion de un enfoque estrategico, marcado por la internacionalizacion de las regiones urbanas y orientado con criterios de competencia; la consideracion del ambito regional como escala adecuada del planeamiento; el fomento de la estructura policentrica de las regiones urbanas y la formacion de redes regionales de ciudades; la densificacion de las areas consolidadas como alternativa a la urbanizacion de nuevos espacios; la colaboracion entre los distintos niveles de la administracion publica y el estimulo de la colaboracion publico-privada; la preocupacion por el entorno y por la calidad de vida; la priorizacion del transporte publico; la modernizacion del aparato de planificacion, incrementando la transparencia y la flexibilidad. Abstract The current patterns of planning in the European capitals have a number of factors in common denoting the main trends and aims: introduction of a strategic approach, marked by the internationalisation of the urban regions and based on competition criteria; consideration of the regional level as a suitable scale for planning; promotion of the multi-centre structure of the urban regions and building of regional networks of cities; densification of consolidated areas as an alternative to the development of new spaces; collaboration between different levels of the public administration and encouragement of cooperation between the public and private sectors; concern for the environment and quality of life; priorisation of public transport; lastly, modernisation of planning tools, with enhanced transparency and flexibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".