MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Left ventricular function many years after recovery from pre-eclampsia

2010· article· en· W1914200679 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Health Economics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsovolumetric contractionMedicineHELLP syndromeEclampsiaHaemolysisInternal medicineCardiologyObstetrics and gynaecologyObstetricsAsymptomaticPregnancyBlood pressureDiastole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological observations have shown that women with pre-eclampsia are at increased risk for subsequent development of cardiovascular disease. We evaluated maternal haemodynamics in asymptomatic women many years after pre-eclampsia and HELLP (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: University-based department of obstetrics. POPULATION: Forty-eight women, 13-18 years after the affected pregnancy: 17 women with a history of HELLP syndrome, 14 women with a history of pre-eclampsia and 17 women following normal pregnancy (control group). METHODS: Echocardiographic examination was performed in all groups, recording the isovolumetric contraction time and isovolumetric relaxation time (ICT + IVRT), ejection time (ET), myocardial performance index (MPI), transmitral early to atrial filling velocity ratio (MV-E/MV-A), stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac function. RESULTS: Women with previous HELLP syndrome showed a significantly increased MPI (0.34 versus 0.26; P = 0.008) and ICT + IVRT (442.16 versus 415.03; P = 0.01); MV-E/A, SV, ET and CO were not significantly different. Women with a history of pre-eclampsia showed a significantly increased MPI (0.36 versus 0.26; P = 0.006) and decreased ET (317.3 versus 328.93; P = 0.04); ICT + IVRT, MV-E/A, SV and CO were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: This study confirms epidemiological observations that women with pre-eclampsia are at increased risk for subsequent development of cardiovascular disease. Many years after HELLP syndrome or pre-eclampsia, asymptomatic women have an increased risk for impaired cardiac function as shown by an increased MPI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it