MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1914436116 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226396

Fast calculation of the magnetic field in the system with radial current-carrying using thin sheet inductors

2004· article· en· W1914436116 on OpenAlexaff
Cevdet Akyel, Slaven Kincic, Slobodan Babić

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical conductorMagnetic fieldInductanceInductorFinite element methodCurrent (fluid)Current sheetMechanicsField (mathematics)Computer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysisMaterials scienceMathematicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringMagnetohydrodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with an efficient approach for determining the magnetic field in systems with radial current carrying using thin sheet conductors. The obtained expressions permit to considerably reduce computational time compared to other known methods (filament method, FEM, BEM). All results are obtained in analytical form over incomplete elliptical integrals of the second and third kinds. These expressions can be usefully employed to calculate the magnetic fields in more complicated geometries and may be used to evaluate the self- and mutual-inductance coefficients in systems with thin and massive conductors. In this paper, as a comparative method regarding the accuracy and computational cost, we use the well-known filament method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207