An Assessment of Wal-Mart's Global Expansion Strategy in the Light of its Domestic Strategy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has globalized its operations to sell to underserved markets and to gain the earnings growth demanded by its shareholders. Wal-Mart dominates the U.S. market and derives 24% of its sales from 14 international markets. It achieved early success in Mexico, Canada and later in the U.K. It failed with market entries into Germany, South Korea, Hong Kong and Indonesia. Its success in other markets is yet to be decided. Wal-Mart's domestic strategy can be reduced to five factors, many of which are not possible in global markets. Wal-Mart claims that its global policy is one of transporting its domestic strategy factors globally, yet its history shows inconsistencies in achieving this. We assess Wal-Mart's global network and suggest some host nations where Wal-Mart might do well. The key goal of this paper is to highlight the surprising gap between Wal-Mart's domestic and global strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it