MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1915556453 · doi:10.1139/p11-147

New robust passivity criteria for discrete-time genetic regulatory networks with Markovian jumping parameters

2012· article· en· W1915556453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
K. Mathiyalagan, R. Sakthivel, S. Marshal Anthoni

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityUpper and lower boundsInterval (graph theory)Set (abstract data type)Stability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Linear matrix inequalityApplied mathematicsDiscrete time and continuous timeComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationControl (management)Mathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present some novel results for robust passivity of a class of uncertain discrete-time Markovian jumping genetic regulatory networks (GRNs) with time-varying delays. By constructing a new set of Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals, together with the matrix inequality technique, we provide a new set of results for the passiveness, and also ensure the mean-square asymptotical stability (internally) of the considered GRNs about their equilibrium points for all time delays satisfying both the lower bound and upper bound of the interval time-varying delay. Further, the obtained results are extended to deal with the robust passiveness of the considered GRNs for all admissible uncertainties. The obtained conditions are derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), which can be easily verified via the LMI toolbox. Finally, numerical examples with simulation results are provided for the GRN model to illustrate the applicability and usefulness of the theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207