MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1915581522 · doi:10.18187/pjsor.v8i3.530

A Markov Model for Analyzing Polytomous Outcome Data

2012· article· en· W1915581522 on OpenAlexaff
M. Ataharul Islam, Rafiqul I. Chowdhury, Karan P. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSpatial and Panel Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute on AgingUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsPolytomous Rasch modelMathematicsMarkov chainStatisticsMarkov modelOutcome (game theory)EconometricsApplied mathematicsItem response theoryMathematical economicsPsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper highlights the estimation and test procedures for multi-state Markov models with covariate dependences in higher orders.Logistic link functions are used to analyze the transition probabilities of three or more states of a Markov model emerging from a longitudinal study.For illustration purpose the models are used for analysis of panel data on Health and Retirement Study conducted in USA during 1992-2002.The applications use self reported data on perceived emotional health at each round of the nationwide survey conducted among the elderly people.Useful and detailed results on the change in the perceived emotional health status among the elderly people are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.305
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation ResearchSame topicSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207