La jurisdicción en las formas modernas de contratación del transporte aéreo internacional de pasajeros
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente articulo indaga acerca de los desafios que las nuevas formas de contratacion electronica presentan al contrato de transporte aereo en materia de jurisdiccion. A tal efecto, se efectua primeramente un repaso de los componentes tradicionales del concepto dentro del Sistema de Varsovia, analizando el significado de cada uno de ellos. A continuacion, se realiza similar ejercicio con respecto a la asi denominada quinta jurisdiccion introducida por el Convenio de Montreal de 1999. En particular, se estudia la problematica que se presenta con la aparicion de las modalidades de reserva y compra de pasajes por medios tales como Internet o los kioscos ubicados en los aeropuertos, y como la naturaleza de estos actos influye en la determinacion del lugar de celebracion del contrato y cual es la incidencia que en este esquema tiene el domicilio del pasajero. Todos estos aspectos son evaluados a la luz de la mas importante y reciente jurisprudencia internacional elaborada sobre el particular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".