Experimental analysis of human body effects on NLOS 60 GHz propagation channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reported are the results of an experimental investigation of human body scattering effects on non-line-of-sight (NLOS) 60 GHz broadband propagation channel. Based on sweeping-frequency sounding technique (59.6 - 60.6 GHz), an indoor propagation measurement campaign is carried out in a typical L-shaped intersection of two corridors, each with a length of 10 m. Thus, with and without the presence of a person at the corridors intersection, the channel's statistical propagation characteristics are extracted and analyzed. The channel's performance is investigated in terms of RMS delays, path loss and Ricean K-factor fading distributions. The experimental results show that NLOS mm-wave propagation characteristics are very hostile where a severe path loss is recorded in the NLOS corridors under consideration. Moreover, unlike line-of-sight (LOS) channel, the presence of person in the considered channel enhances NLOS propagation characteristics and thus, provides a better signal coverage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".