MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1916529705 · doi:10.1002/mds.25518

Alpha‐synuclein gene duplication: Marked intrafamilial variability in two novel pedigrees

2013· article· en· W1916529705 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Emanuele Elia, Simona Petrucci, Alfonso Fasano, Marco Guidi, Stefano Valbonesi, Laura Bernardini, Federica Consoli, Alessandro Ferraris, Alberto Albanese, Enza Maria Valente

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement DisordersUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene duplicationDementiaAlpha-synucleinParkinson's diseasePedigree chartDiseaseSynucleinDysautonomiaGenetic heterogeneityGeneticsPhenotypeMedicineBiologyNeuroscienceGenePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Multiplications of the SNCA gene that encodes alpha-synuclein are a rare cause of autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Here, we describe 2 novel families in which there is autosomal dominant PD associated with SNCA duplication, and we compare the clinical features of all known patients carrying 3 or 4 SNCA copies. RESULTS: Affected members in family A presented with early onset PD that was variably associated with nonmotor features, such as dysautonomia, cognitive deficits, and psychiatric disturbances. In family B, the clinical presentation ranged from early onset PD-dementia with psychiatric disturbances to late onset PD with mild cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of 4 SNCA copies is associated with a rich phenotype, characterized by earlier onset of motor and nonmotor features compared with patients who bear 3 SNCA copies. The clinical spectrum associated with SNCA duplications is wide, even within a single family, suggesting a role for as yet unidentified genetic or environmental modifiers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207