Les télécommunications par satellite et le droit international, vers une règlementation renouvelée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le renouvellement du droit applicable aux telecommunications par satellite se pose avec une acuite particuliere, du fait du mouvement de liberalisation du marche. Ce processus implique des mutations reglementaires globales et un ajustement au niveau des legislations nationales. Il existe une dialectique entre la logique de globalisation, inherente au developpement de reseaux globaux de communication par satellite, par definition rebelles a toute notion de frontiere, et une visibilite nouvelle du role des Etats qui se reapproprient des spheres de puissances dans les espaces reglementaires liberes par la globalisation. Cependant, ce renouvellement du droit des telecommunications par satellite est a l'origine de la desuetude progressive du droit de l'Espace, pourtant a bien des egards utile a la reglementation en cours d'elaboration, ne serait-ce que par son aspect ethique et par son realisme avant-gardiste vis-a-vis des activites spatiales commerciales. La regulation moderne aurait pu s'en inspirer ou meme s'appuyer dessus. Force est de constater, a l'examen du traitement reserve a la gestion des ressources naturelles spatiales par les Etats, que le droit de l'Espace est un droit depasse, la concurrence des droits composants la sphere juridique spatiale lui ayant ete defavorable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".