Enjeux et perspectives de la représentation d’une mémoire caribéenne dans le roman caribéen-canadien anglophone des années 2000
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude examine les enjeux et la portée de la représentation des mémoires caribéennes dans les romans publiés par les Caribéens-Canadiens anglophones Austin Clarke, Ramabai Espinet, Dionne Brand et David Chariandy durant les années 2000. Elle démontre que leurs représentations de ces mémoires refusent l’amnésie culturelle, tout en concourant à l’élaboration d’une mémoire collective caribéenne canadienne transnationale, pluriethnique et multidirectionnelle ainsi qu’à la définition d’une identité caribéenne-canadienne. Elle met en évidence le statut d’entrepreneurs mémoriels de ces auteurs investis dans une action de programmation culturelle qui les engage dans le débat canadien sur le statut des extraterritorialités culturelles dans la définition de la mémoire et de l’identité canadiennes. La transmission est également abordée, en relation avec la réception de ces ouvrages par les institutions du polysystème littéraire canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".