MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Endocrine complications in children treated for medulloblastoma or ependymoma using radiation therapy. Outcomes in the CT-planning era

2009· article· en· W1917082840 on OpenAlexaff
Gautam Bahl, Stacey Urbach, Ute Bartels, David Hodgson, Barbara‐Ann Millar, Amy Parent, Lisa W. Le, Susan Awrey, Normand Laperrière

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedulloblastomaEpendymomaRadiation therapyDiabetes insipidusPrecocious pubertyPediatricsSurgeryInternal medicineHormonePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10064 Background: The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of late endocrine complications following radiation therapy (RT) in children treated for medulloblastomas or ependymomas. Methods: Seventy children with medulloblastoma or ependymoma were treated using RT from June 2000 to June 2005 at our institute. Median age at diagnosis was 6 years (range 1–17), and 52 (74%) were boys. Forty-eight patients (69%) had medulloblastomas and 22 (31%) had ependymomas. Twenty-two received highly conformal RT to the tumor bed alone (focal RT: median dose 54 Gy, range 54–59.4), 24 received low dose cranio-spinal RT (CSI: median dose 23.4 Gy) followed by a boost to the post fossa/tumor bed (median 30.6 Gy), and 24 patients received high dose CSI (median 36 Gy) followed by a boost (median 18 Gy). Only two of the 22 children with ependymomas received CSI. All patients underwent CT-based planning and were treated using conventional fractionation; 58 (83%) also received chemotherapy. None of the children had documented endocrinopathy prior to diagnosis. Results: After a median follow-up of 65.3 months, the 5-yr PFS and OS was 70% and 75% for children with medulloblastomas, and 54% and 84% for patients with ependymomas, respectively. Thirty-five children developed evidence of endocrinopathy (Growth hormone deficiency (GHD): 31, hypothyroidism (HPT): 23, precocious puberty (PP): 6, gonadotropin deficiency: 3, ACTH deficiency: 2, and diabetes insipidus: 2). The 5-yr cumulative incidence (CI) of endocrinopathy was 71% for the children treated with CSI vs. 18% for those treated with focal RT (Gray's test p-value = 0.004). The median time to development of endocrinopathy was 38 months for the patients who had CSI. For these children the 5-yr CI was 68% for GHD, 52% for HPT, and 16% for PP. There was no significant difference in the incidence of endocrinopathy for patients treated with low dose vs. high dose CSI. Conclusions: The 5-yr CI of endocrine toxicity in children treated with cranio-spinal RT is 71% (median time to development: 38 months), which is significantly higher than in children treated with focal RT. All children treated for medulloblastomas or ependymomas require long-term surveillance and close monitoring for the development of endocrinopathies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→