MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1917200568 · doi:10.3233/scc-2001-232

On‐board scheduling for multimedia applications

2001· article· en· W1917200568 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Communications · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsSte. Anne's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer scienceTime division multiple accessComputer networkQuality of serviceScheduling (production processes)BroadbandMulti-frequency time division multiple accessBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth allocationDynamic bandwidth allocationBroadband networksTelecommunicationsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses on‐board dynamic bandwidth allocation for satellite OBP‐based broadband multimedia interactive applications. The paper presents a bandwidth allocation scheme which is oriented towards guaranteeing the Quality of Service (QoS) associated with, but not limited to, the various traffic services/classes as defined by the ATM forum. A novel uplink (UL) access scheme is proposed, based on a Multi‐Frequency Time Division Multiple Access (MF‐TDMA) primary access scheme. The uplink access protocol derived from the proposed scheme can be supported directly on board by the means of the scheduler function. The performance of the uplink access scheme has been evaluated through extensive simulations and sample results are presented and commented. EMS’ heritage on both ground and OBP‐based schedulers is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it