MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1917734344 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/44

SAGITTARIUS II, DRACO II AND LAEVENS 3: THREE NEW MILKY WAY SATELLITES DISCOVERED IN THE PAN-STARRS 1 3<i>π</i>SURVEY

2015· article· en· W1917734344 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Benjamin P. M. Laevens, Nicolas F. Martin, Edouard J. Bernard, Edward F. Schlafly, Branimir Sesar, Hans‐Walter Rix, Eric F. Bell, A. M. N. Ferguson, Colin T. Slater, William E. Sweeney, Rosemary F. Ġ. Wyse, Avon Huxor, W. S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, P. W. Draper, K. W. Hodapp, N. Kaiser, E. A. Magnier, N. Metcalfe, J. Tonry, R. J. Wainscoat, C. Waters

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilPlanetary Science DivisionScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueQueen's UniversityUniversity of EdinburghJohns Hopkins UniversityQueen's University BelfastNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversité de StrasbourgDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGlobular clusterMilky WaySagittariusDwarf galaxyAstronomyAstrophysicsDwarf spheroidal galaxyLocal GroupGalaxyStar clusterInteracting galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the discovery of three new Milky Way satellites from our search for compact stellar overdensities in the photometric catalog of the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System 1 (Pan-STARRS 1, or PS1) 3 survey. The first satellite, Laevens 3, is located at a heliocentric distance of d = 67 3 kpc. With a total magnitude of M V = -4.4 0.3 and a half-light radius of r h = 7 2 pc, its properties resemble those of outer halo globular clusters. The second system, Draco II/Laevens 4, is a closer and fainter satellite (d 20 kpc, M V = -2.9 0.8), whose uncertain size (r 19 pc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations239
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207