MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1918031147 · doi:10.22329/celt.v7i1.3991

The Development of a New Master’s of Science in Healthcare Quality Program

2014· article· en· W1918031147 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kim Sears, Briana Broderick, David Goldstein, Denise Stockley

Bibliographic record

VenueCollected Essays on Learning and Teaching · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careQuality (philosophy)Asynchronous communicationFace (sociological concept)Asynchronous learningMedical educationEngineering managementEngineering ethicsComputer sciencePsychologySociologyEngineeringPedagogyMedicinePolitical scienceTeaching methodCooperative learningSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With a goal to advance the healthcare quality agenda and in response to an identified need within both the educational and healthcare sector, Queen’s University established a Master’s degree in Healthcare Quality. The unique interdisciplinary Master of Science in Healthcare Quality program offers a mix of both theoretical and practical underpinnings. This program has been built on solid educational pedagogy and offers both synchronous and asynchronous delivery via a distance learning platform and three face to face encounters. Further, this program will offer Canadian and international perspectives on quality, risk, and safety in healthcare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCollected Essays on Learning and TeachingSame topicHealthcare Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207