MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1918173514

Military Corruption and Organized Crime in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus

2005· article· en· W1918173514 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Lt Stephen Chledowski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of military and strategic studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCrime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed Forces
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDominance (genetics)TemptationTerrorismLanguage changePolitical scienceTransparency (behavior)PaceAccountabilityCriminologyLawSovereigntyClanSociologyPoliticsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Governments rely on their military for a basis of continued sovereignty and authority. This relationship however can become weakened when a military becomes corrupt and is influenced by organized crime. Clan-based, criminal family groups have now morphed into trans-national criminal organizations. In addition, the rise in prominence and influence of Muslim terrorist groups has changed the nature of organized crime. Military boarder guards in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus often succumb to the irresistible temptation of bribes from drug traffickers because of low wages and deplorable conditions. Ill-treatment and human rights abuses of these conscript soldiers by older recruits or their officers are also a continuing problem. Most governments do not have the resources, or manpower necessary to combat these abuses or the influence of criminal organizations. There is a need to create better accountability and transparency within the military, also more innovation and funds are necessary to keep pace with, and curb the rising dominance of criminal organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of military and strategic studiesSame topicCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207