Les dimensions de l’américanisation en question : modalités d’adoption de l’idéologie de la valeur actionnariale dans les rapports annuels d’entreprises du CAC 40 (1998-2012)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’américanisation, en tant que processus d’importation de modèles de management américains, soulève deux principales questions : 1) la question de ce qui est transféré et adopté, c’est-à-dire de ses dimensions : le modèle dans son ensemble ou ses composantes; 2) celle des modalités d’adoption de ces éléments. L’ambition de cet article est d’y répondre en étudiant les dimensions et modalités d’adoption de la composante idéologique du modèle américain de la création de valeur actionnariale en France et ce, sur une quinzaine d’années. Les résultats révèlent une faible adoption de la composante idéologique du modèle de la valeur actionnariale au sein du CAC 40, au bénéfice de l’hybridation et du particularisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".